🆚 Couch vs. Open Journal Systems
- 📈 Open Journal Systems is much more popular than Couch.
- 🌍 Open Journal Systems is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Couch is particularly popular in the United Kingdom.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Open Journal SystemsType
Content management system
Content management system
About
PHPOpen Journal Systems is an open-source software for managing and publishing peer-reviewed academic journals.
It provides a complete publishing workflow with role-based editorial management, customizable journal websites, section-based submissions, double-blind and open peer review options, and 
ORCID integration.
Headquarters
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
Pricing
Free version ✔️ Allows commercial use, includes attribution, open source
Commercial license $69
Free ✔️ Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Open Journal Systems CMS is 24 times more popular than Couch.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Open Journal Systems is more popular than Couch in all countries.
United States
Indonesia
Canada
Brazil
India
Germany
Spain
Ukraine
Italy
Russia
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Indonesia in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Brazil in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Ukraine in the CMS category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Canada in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Open Journal Systems is more popular among sites focused on education and reference, business, and health, while Couch is more commonly used on software and hardware, finance and banking, and sports sites.
Education/Reference
Business
Health
Marketing/Merchandising
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
General News
Software/Hardware
Art/Culture/Heritage
Finance/Banking
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
WordPress
Joomla
Drupal
Contao
Concrete CMS
Modern Campus
Terminalfour
Cascade CMS🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.