🆚 css-vars-ponyfill vs. Emotion
- 📈 Emotion is twice as popular as css-vars-ponyfill.
- 🌎 Emotion is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 css-vars-ponyfill is more popular in Canada, Austria, and Colombia.
EmotionType
About
Client-side support for 
CSS custom properties (aka "CSS variables") in legacy and modern browsers.
Emotion is an open-source CSS-in-JS library for writing and managing styles with 
JavaScript and 
TypeScript that can be used both with 
React and in a framework-agnostic way.
It supports object and template literal syntax, automatic vendor prefixing, source maps, server-side rendering, nested selectors, and theming, and can optimize generated styles through compile-time transformations using its 
Babel integration.
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 76th most popular in Austria in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 87th most popular in New Zealand in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 95th most popular in Finland in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 101st most popular in Denmark in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 103rd most popular in Canada in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 46th most popular in Uzbekistan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 49th most popular in Norway in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 57th most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 61st most popular in Sweden in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 63rd most popular in Ireland in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Animsition
StyleX
Beasties
Styled Components
Tailwind CSS🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.