🆚 CSSLint vs. JSLint
- 📈 JSLint is much more popular than CSSLint.
- 🌎 JSLint is more popular in the United States, Brazil, and Poland.
- 🌍 CSSLint is more popular in India and Indonesia.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
CSS tool
Static code analysis tool
About
CSSLint is an open-source code quality tool for static analysis of 
CSS code.
JSLint is a code quality tool that looks for problems in 
JavaScript programs.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
CSS Tools › Rank #8
Static Code Analysis › Rank #5
Static Code Analysis › Rank #4
Tools › Rank #57
Tools › Rank #46
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The JSLint static code analysis tool is 11 times more popular than CSSLint.
Total websites
Market share
Static Code Analysis
Tools
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
JSLint is more popular in the United States, Brazil, and Poland, while CSSLint is more popular in India and Indonesia.
United States
Brazil
Poland
Malaysia
Germany
Italy
Czech Republic
France
Denmark
United Kingdom
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Static Code Analysis category.
- ⬆️ 46th most popular in the United States in the Tools category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
JSLint is more popular than CSSLint in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Internet Services
Marketing/Merchandising
Public Information
Education/Reference
Health
Fashion/Beauty
Blogs/Wiki
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
RTLCSS
Autoprefixer
Webpack🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.