🆚 CubicWeb vs. Django
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 Django is much more popular than CubicWeb.
- 🌍 Django is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ CubicWeb is particularly popular in France.
Type
Backend framework
Backend framework
About
CubicWeb is an open-source Python web framework designed with Semantic Web principles in mind.
Django is a high-level Python web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
Headquarters
Huntersville, North Carolina, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Backend Frameworks › Rank #64
Backend Frameworks › Rank #15
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Django backend framework is 973 times more popular than CubicWeb.
Total websites
Market share
Backend Frameworks
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Django is more popular than CubicWeb in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Russia
Switzerland
Netherlands
Italy
Spain
France
Canada
Awards
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Ukraine in the Backend Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Croatia in the Backend Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Russia in the Backend Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Finland in the Backend Frameworks category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Switzerland in the Backend Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Django is more popular than CubicWeb in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Travel
General News
Health
Software/Hardware
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
Data updated
* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.
When interpreting and using the results, please read our methodology and disclaimer.