🆚 Dexie.js vs. LocalForage
- 📈 Dexie.js is much more popular than LocalForage.
- 🌍 Dexie.js is more popular in Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine.
- 🌎 LocalForage is more popular in the United States, Germany, and India.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Dexie.js is a minimalistic wrapper library for IndexedDB.
An offline storage library that provides a unified API for IndexedDB, WebSQL, and localStorage.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #204
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #264
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Dexie.js JavaScript library is 6 times more popular than LocalForage.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Dexie.js is more popular in Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine, while LocalForage is more popular in the United States, Germany, and India.
Russia
Belarus
United States
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Germany
Brazil
India
China
Japan
Awards
- ⬆️ 38th most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 40th most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 53rd most popular in Kazakhstan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 140th most popular in Ukraine in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 261st most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Dexie.js is more popular than LocalForage in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
General News
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Health
Travel
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
UAParser.js