🆚 DigitalOcean vs. Gridscale
- 📈 DigitalOcean is much more popular than Gridscale.
- 🌍 DigitalOcean is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Gridscale is particularly popular in Germany.
Type
About
DigitalOcean is a cloud computing service provider that offers developers and businesses scalable infrastructure and platform solutions such as virtual machines, managed databases, object and block storage, and container orchestration.
It provides on-demand Droplet virtual machines with multiple CPU and memory tiers, a managed Kubernetes service with automated scaling, managed
PostgreSQL/MySQL/Redis databases with backups and high availability, S3-compatible object storage
Spaces, block storage Volumes, serverless Functions, and a marketplace of one-click application deployments.
Gridscale is a German cloud computing platform that offers virtual servers, managed databases, Kubernetes, and other cloud solutions, and is currently owned by OVHcloud.
It provides pay-as-you-grow public, private, and hybrid cloud deployments, managed Kubernetes and databases, object storage, and AMD GPU instances — all hosted in data centers located in Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Austria.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the Maldives in the Cloud Services category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Singapore in the Cloud Services category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Slovakia in the Cloud Services category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Latvia in the Cloud Services category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Georgia in the Cloud Services category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Germany in the Cloud Services category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.