🆚 DNN vs. GEM2GO
- 📈 DNN is much more popular than GEM2GO.
- 🌎 DNN is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands.
- 🌍 GEM2GO is more popular in Austria.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
DNN, formerly known as DotNetNuke, is a free and open-source content management system based on .NET and MS SQL Server.
It supports multi-portal management from a single installation and features a marketplace with thousands of modules and skins, along with enterprise-grade tools for user permissions and content workflows.
GEM2GO is an Austrian content management system for communities.
Headquarters
Austin, Texas, United States
Steyr-Gleink, Austria
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The DNN CMS is 13 times more popular than GEM2GO.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
DNN is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, while GEM2GO is more popular in Austria.
United States
Austria
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Germany
Iran
Australia
Vietnam
Japan
Canada
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Iran in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Vietnam in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Croatia in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Slovenia in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Austria in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
DNN is more popular than GEM2GO in all market segments.
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Education/Reference
Finance/Banking
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Online Shopping
Government/Military
Health
Travel
Public Information
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.