🆚 DNN vs. Joomla

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

DNN, formerly known as DotNetNuke, is a free and open-source content management system based on .NET and MS SQL Server.

It supports multi-portal management from a single installation and features a marketplace with thousands of modules and skins, along with enterprise-grade tools for user permissions and content workflows.

Joomla is an open-source content management system written in PHP.

It offers a flexible extension system with over 4,000 extensions, a template-driven architecture, access control levels, built-in multilingual support, and tools for content versioning and SEO management.

Headquarters

Austin, Texas, United States
New York, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

CMS › Rank #12
CMS › Rank #2

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Joomla CMS is 13 times more popular than DNN.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Joomla is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Italy, while DNN is more popular in Liechtenstein.
United States
Germany
Italy
United Kingdom
Russia
Poland
Spain
France
Netherlands
Greece

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Joomla is more popular than DNN in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Travel
Internet Services
Health
Sports
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Online Shopping
Entertainment

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#5,474
#11,476
#13,640
View more ➝
Name
Rank
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.