🆚 DNN vs. K2

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

DNN, formerly known as DotNetNuke, is a free and open-source content management system based on .NET and MS SQL Server.

It supports multi-portal management from a single installation and features a marketplace with thousands of modules and skins, along with enterprise-grade tools for user permissions and content workflows.

K2 is a Joomla content management extension that replaces and enhances the default article system.

Headquarters

Austin, Texas, United States
Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

CMS › Rank #12
CMS › Rank #11

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The K2 CMS is 1.1 times more popular than DNN.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

K2 is more popular in Italy, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while DNN is more popular in the United States, the Netherlands, and Iran.
United States
Italy
United Kingdom
Germany
Greece
Spain
Russia
Netherlands
Iran
France

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

K2 is more popular among sites focused on travel, Internet services, and general news, while DNN is more commonly used on marketing and merchandising, business, and education and reference sites.
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Education/Reference
Travel
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Online Shopping
Sports
Internet Services
General News

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#5,474
#11,476
#13,640
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#9,839
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.