🆚 DocFX vs. Read the Docs
- 📈 Read the Docs is much more popular than DocFX.
- 🌍 Read the Docs is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Static site generator
Deployment platform
About
DocFX is a static site generator for .NET API documentation.
Read the Docs is a continuous documentation deployment platform that automatically builds, versions, and hosts software documentation from
Git repositories.
It integrates with GitHub,
GitLab, and Bitbucket to rebuild documentation on every commit, supports tools like Sphinx, MkDocs, and Jupyter Book, hosts multiple versions with full-text search and downloadable PDF and EPUB formats, and offers previews for pull requests.
Headquarters
Portland, Oregon, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️Community, free for open source, ad-supported, open source
Community Gold
(ad-free)$5/month
(ad-free)$5/month
Business Advanced$150/month
Business Pro$250/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Read the Docs deployment platform is 11 times more popular than DocFX.
Total websites
Market share
Static Site Generators
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Read the Docs is more popular than DocFX in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
France
Germany
Norway
Hungary
Brazil
Ukraine
Switzerland
Czech Republic
Awards
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United States in the Static Site Generators category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in the United States in the Deployment Platforms category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Read the Docs is more popular than DocFX in all market segments.
Technical Information
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Technical/Business Forums
Business
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.