🆚 Docsify vs. Hugo
- 📈 Hugo is much more popular than Docsify.
- 🌍 Hugo is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
HugoType
Static site generator
Static site generator
About
Docsify turns one or more 
Markdown files into a Website, with no build process required.
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go that focuses on speed, flexibility and structured content organization.
It supports Markdown content, templating, configurable taxonomies, multilingual sites, image processing, 
Sass and 
JavaScript pipelines, pretty URLs, a live-reload development server, and shortcodes to insert elements such as videos, images and social media embeds.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Static Site Generators › Rank #22
Static Site Generators › Rank #3
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Hugo static site generator is 87 times more popular than Docsify.
Total websites
Market share
Static Site Generators
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Hugo is more popular than Docsify in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Netherlands
Japan
Switzerland
China
Australia
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Static Site Generators category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Static Site Generators category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Canada in the Static Site Generators category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Netherlands in the Static Site Generators category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Switzerland in the Static Site Generators category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Hugo is more popular than Docsify in all market segments.
Blogs/Wiki
Business
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Technical/Business Forums
Technical Information
Marketing/Merchandising
Games
Personal Pages
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Docusaurus
MkDocs
GitBook
Jekyll
VitePress🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.