🆚 Docusaurus vs. GitBook
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 Docusaurus is twice as popular as GitBook.
- 🌎 Docusaurus is more popular in the United States, China, and Germany.
- 🌎 GitBook is more popular in Brazil and the Cayman Islands.
Type
Static site generator
Static site generator
About
Docusaurus is a static site generator for React-powered documentation websites.
GitBook is a cloud-based documentation platform for the creation and publishing of product and API documentation and knowledge bases.
Headquarters
Menlo Park, California, United States
Covina, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️Open source
Plus$10/user/month
Pro$15/user/month
Categories
Static Site Generators › Rank #5
Static Site Generators › Rank #11
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Docusaurus static site generator is 2.5 times more popular than GitBook.
Total websites
Market share
Static Site Generators
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Docusaurus is more popular in the United States, China, and Germany, while GitBook is more popular in Brazil and the Cayman Islands.
United States
China
Germany
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Switzerland
Russia
Australia
Taiwan
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United States in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in China in the Static Site Generators category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Docusaurus is more popular than GitBook in all market segments.
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Business
Technical Information
Technical/Business Forums
Shareware/Freeware
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Name
Rank
#20,165
#23,696
#26,744
#49,569
#50,439
Name
Rank
#181,697
#427,668
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
Data updated
* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.
When interpreting and using the results, please read our methodology and disclaimer.