🆚 Docusaurus vs. Jekyll
- 📈 Jekyll is twice as popular as Docusaurus.
- 🌎 Jekyll is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Docusaurus is more popular in China, Vietnam, and Estonia.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Static site generator
Static site generator
About
Docusaurus is a static site generator for React-powered documentation websites that uses MDX and a React-based theme system.
It provides built-in document versioning, internationalization, a flexible plugin architecture, and support for
Algolia DocSearch and
Typesense.
Headquarters
Menlo Park, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Static Site Generators › Rank #5
Static Site Generators › Rank #4
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Jekyll static site generator is 2.3 times more popular than Docusaurus.
Total websites
Market share
Static Site Generators
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Jekyll is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while Docusaurus is more popular in China, Vietnam, and Estonia.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
China
France
Netherlands
Australia
Brazil
Canada
Italy
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United States in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the Static Site Generators category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Jekyll is more popular than Docusaurus in all market segments.
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Business
Technical Information
Technical/Business Forums
Education/Reference
Games
Marketing/Merchandising
Personal Pages
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

