🆚 Docusaurus vs. ReadMe

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Static site generator
Static site generator

About

Docusaurus is a static site generator for React-powered documentation websites that uses MDX and a React-based theme system.

It provides built-in document versioning, internationalization, a flexible plugin architecture, and support for Algolia DocSearch and Typesense DocSearch.

ReadMe is a cloud-based documentation platform that helps teams create, publish, and manage interactive API documentation hubs.

It provides a WYSIWYG and MDX (Markdown eXtended) editor with versioning and Git sync, interactive API references where developers can test endpoints and see live responses, built-in AI tools for writing and linting, customizable components and themes, and changelogs and guides.

Headquarters

Menlo Park, California, United States
San Francisco, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️3 published versions, no custom domain or forum
Plans
Startup$99/month
Business$399/month
Enterprise$3,000+/month
Ask AI
(an AI assistant)
$150

Categories

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Docusaurus static site generator is 3 times more popular than ReadMe.
Total websites

Market share

Static Site Generators

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Docusaurus is more popular in the United States, China, and Germany, while ReadMe is more popular in Brazil.
United States
China
Germany
United Kingdom
France
Australia
Netherlands
Canada
Switzerland
Japan

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Docusaurus is more popular than ReadMe in all market segments.
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Technical Information
Business
Technical/Business Forums
Shareware/Freeware
Games
Blogs/Wiki
Content Server
Marketing/Merchandising

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.