🆚 Docusaurus vs. Scully
- 📈 Docusaurus is much more popular than Scully.
- 🌎 Docusaurus is more popular in the United States, Germany, and China.
- 🌎 Scully is more popular in Spain and Mexico.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Static site generator
Static site generator
About
Docusaurus is a static site generator for React-powered documentation websites that uses MDX and a React-based theme system.
It provides built-in document versioning, internationalization, a flexible plugin architecture, and support for Algolia DocSearch and Typesense DocSearch.
Scully is a static site generator for Angular projects looking to embrace the Jamstack.
Headquarters
Menlo Park, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Static Site Generators › Rank #5
Static Site Generators › Rank #19
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Docusaurus static site generator is 10 times more popular than Scully.
Total websites
Market share
Static Site Generators
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Docusaurus is more popular in the United States, Germany, and China, while Scully is more popular in Spain and Mexico.
United States
Germany
China
United Kingdom
France
Australia
Canada
Switzerland
Poland
Netherlands
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in China in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United States in the Static Site Generators category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Docusaurus is more popular among sites focused on software and hardware, Internet services, and business, while Scully is more commonly used on finance and banking, education and reference, and sports sites.
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Business
Technical Information
Technical/Business Forums
Shareware/Freeware
Games
Finance/Banking
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Doxygen