🆚 Dripicons vs. Fork Awesome
- 📈 Dripicons is much more popular than Fork Awesome.
- 🌍 Dripicons is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Icon library
Icon library
About
A completely free set of 200 vector icons.
Fork Awesome is a suite of 796 pictographic and brand icons that began as a fork of Font Awesome.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Dripicons library is 28 times more popular than Fork Awesome.
Total websites
Market share
Icons
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Dripicons is more popular than Fork Awesome in all countries.
United States
Italy
Spain
Germany
United Kingdom
Australia
France
Netherlands
Canada
India
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Spain in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in South Africa in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Italy in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Australia in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Portugal in the Icons category.
- ⬆️ 25th most popular in Germany in the Icons category.
- ⬆️ 28th most popular in France in the Icons category.
- ⬆️ 33rd most popular in the United States in the Icons category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Dripicons is more popular than Fork Awesome in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Travel
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Online Shopping
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.