🆚 Easyweb vs. Sanity

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

Easyweb is a Swedish headless content management system for websites and webshops.

Sanity is a cloud-based headless CMS that stores content as structured data in a hosted content lake and delivers it via APIs to any frontend.

It features a customizable open-source editing Studio built with React, real-time collaboration support, its own query language for JSON called GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries) alongside GraphQL, an asset pipeline with image transformations, versioning, localization, and enterprise capabilities such as SSO and role-based access.

Headquarters

Stockholm, Sweden
San Francisco, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
Custom
Free version ✔️
Growth$15/seat/month
EnterpriseCustom

Categories

CMS › Rank #201
CMS › Rank #15
E-Commerce › Rank #237

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Sanity CMS is 75 times more popular than Easyweb.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Sanity is more popular than Easyweb in all countries.
United States
Norway
United Kingdom
Australia
Sweden
Germany
Netherlands
Denmark
Canada
France

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Sanity is more popular than Easyweb in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Health
Travel
Entertainment
Education/Reference
Software/Hardware
Fashion/Beauty

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#92,851
#595,877
#1,378,720
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,434
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.