🆚 Elixir vs. Erlang
- 📈 Erlang is twice as popular as Elixir.
- 🌎 Erlang is more popular in the United States, Brazil, and Germany.
- 🌍 Elixir is more popular in Denmark, Canada, and Norway.
ElixirType
About
Elixir is a dynamic, functional programming language that compiles to bytecode for the 
Erlang virtual machine and is designed for building scalable, fault-tolerant applications.
It features a modern syntax with macros for metaprogramming, immutable data structures, pattern matching, lightweight concurrency, hot code upgrades, and interoperability with Erlang modules.
Erlang is a high-level functional programming language designed for building concurrent, distributed, and fault-tolerant systems.
It provides lightweight processes with isolated memory and asynchronous message passing, supports hot code swapping without downtime, and includes the Erlang/OTP platform with supervision trees, reusable behaviors, and a standard library for scalable applications.
Headquarters
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Denmark in the Programming Languages category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in the United States in the Programming Languages category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in Germany in the Programming Languages category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Brazil in the Programming Languages category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United States in the Programming Languages category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Germany in the Programming Languages category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Programming Languages category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Japan in the Programming Languages category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
JavaScript
PHP
C#
Lua
Haskell🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,371,940 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.