🆚 Entypo vs. Fork Awesome
- 📈 Entypo is much more popular than Fork Awesome.
- 🌍 Entypo is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Entypo
Fork AwesomeType
Icon library
Icon library
About
Entypo is an open-source SVG icon library that provides over 400 interface and social pictograms.
Earlier versions also offered an icon font format, which can still be obtained through third-party services such as 
Fontello and 
Fontastic.
Fork Awesome is a suite of 796 pictographic and brand icons that began as a fork of 
Font Awesome.
Headquarters
Stockholm, Sweden
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Entypo icon library is 57 times more popular than Fork Awesome.
Total websites
Market share
Icons
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Entypo is more popular than Fork Awesome in all countries.
United States
Germany
Italy
Spain
Netherlands
United Kingdom
France
Australia
Austria
Canada
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the Netherlands in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Austria in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Iran in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Denmark in the Icons category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Entypo is more popular than Fork Awesome in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Health
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.