🆚 Entypo vs. Phosphor Icons
- 📈 Entypo is much more popular than Phosphor Icons.
- 🌎 Entypo is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Italy.
- 🌍 Phosphor Icons is more popular in Bangladesh, Chile, and Korea.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
EntypoType
Icon library
Icon library
About
Entypo is an open-source SVG icon library that provides over 400 interface and social pictograms.
Earlier versions also offered an icon font format, which can still be obtained through third-party services such as 
Fontello and 
Fontastic.
Phosphor is a flexible icon family for interfaces, diagrams, presentations that includes over 1,200 open-source icons.
Headquarters
Stockholm, Sweden
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Entypo icon library is 19 times more popular than Phosphor Icons.
Total websites
Market share
Icons
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Entypo is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Italy, while Phosphor Icons is more popular in Bangladesh, Chile, and Korea.
United States
Germany
Italy
Spain
Netherlands
United Kingdom
France
Australia
Austria
Canada
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the Netherlands in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Austria in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Iran in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Denmark in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Bangladesh in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Chile in the Icons category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in Brazil in the Icons category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Entypo is more popular than Phosphor Icons in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.