🆚 ES6 Shim vs. Regenerator
- 📈 Regenerator is much more popular than ES6 Shim.
- 🌍 Regenerator is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Provides compatibility shims so that legacy JavaScript engines behave as closely as possible to ECMAScript 6 (Harmony).
Regenerator is a JavaScript library from
Facebook that allows the use of ES6 generators in older browsers.
Headquarters
Menlo Park, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Regenerator JavaScript library is 117 times more popular than ES6 Shim.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Regenerator is more popular than ES6 Shim in all countries.
United States
Japan
Italy
Spain
France
United Kingdom
Germany
Brazil
Netherlands
Australia
Awards
- ⬆️ 67th most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 244th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Israel in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 27th most popular in Vietnam in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 27th most popular in Iran in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 29th most popular in Lithuania in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Regenerator is more popular than ES6 Shim in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Health
Fashion/Beauty
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Regenerator