🆚 Facebook SDK vs. Splide
- 📈 Facebook SDK is much more popular than Splide.
- 🌎 Facebook SDK is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Splide is more popular in Turkmenistan.
SplideType
About
Facebook SDK is a library that provides client-side tools for Social Plugins, Login, and Graph API calls.
It enables loading Social Plugins such as 
Like, Share, or Comments buttons, initiating Facebook Login with configurable permissions, and opening dialogs for sharing, fetching and updating data via Graph API endpoints.
Splide is a lightweight, accessible slider and carousel library written in 
TypeScript.
It requires no dependencies, supports multiple slide layouts, touch and mouse dragging, autoplay, lazy loading, responsive breakpoints, and RTL and vertical modes.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Poland in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Vietnam in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Ukraine in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Hungary in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Sweden in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Estonia in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in France in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
jQuery
Swiper
Polyfill
X for Websites
LinkedIn Platform
Slick
Owl Carousel
Flickity
Tiny Slider
Meta company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,580,200 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.