🆚 Fancyapps vs. Swiper
- 📈 Swiper is three times more popular than Fancyapps.
- 🌎 Swiper is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Japan.
- 🌍 Fancyapps is more popular in Russia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Gibraltar.
Fancyapps
SwiperType
About
Fancyapps is a commercial 
JavaScript UI component library for creating lightboxes, carousels, and interactive image viewers.
It provides touch gesture support, synchronized and nested carousels, image zooming and panning, lazy loading, configurable plugins, and integrations with 
React, 
Vue, and plain JavaScript applications.
Swiper is a modern touch slider library for building responsive sliders and carousels with hardware-accelerated transitions.
It offers touch and swipe navigation optimized for mobile, native-like momentum and resistance effects, support for vertical and horizontal modes, a modular plugin system with pagination, navigation, thumbnails, and parallax, accessibility features, and integrations with popular frameworks such as React, Vue, and 
Angular.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Slovakia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Nolimits4web company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,629,123 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.