🆚 Feather vs. Iconify

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Icon library
Icon library

About

Feather is a collection of 280+ open-source icons.

Iconify is an open-source icon framework that aggregates over 200 icon sets and more than 275,000 vector icons under one standardised API, allowing developers to use icons as web components or via framework-specific wrappers.

It auto-validates, cleans up, and optimises icons for SVG rendering, supports React, Vue, Svelte, SSR environments, provides Tailwind CSS integration, and allows self-hosting of its API.

Headquarters

Tallinn, Estonia

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Icons › Rank #20
Icons › Rank #14

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Iconify library is 3 times more popular than Feather.
Total websites

Market share

Icons

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Iconify is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while Feather is more popular in Bangladesh, Slovenia, and Luxembourg.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
France
India
Netherlands
Spain
Brazil
Australia
Russia

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Iconify is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and online shopping, while Feather is more commonly used on finance and banking sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
General News
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Software/Hardware
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Sports

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#3,133
#5,214
#11,735
View more ➝
Name
Rank
imhentai.x*x
#837
#2,710
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.