๐Ÿ†š FirstSpirit vs. TYPO3

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

Crownpeak FirstSpirit is an enterprise-grade, hybrid, headless CMS that features a drag-and-drop WYSIWYG editor with built-in AI Suite.

It offers content orchestration and AI-driven automation, and supports omnichannel delivery, localization, and regulatory compliance.

TYPO3 is an open-source enterprise content management system written in PHP that supports multisite and multilingual installations and has a large extension repository.

It offers built-in versioning and workflows, strong security backed by long-term support releases, compatibility with major databases, flexible authoring tools, and extensions for headless delivery.

Headquarters

Denver, Colorado, United States
Dรผsseldorf, Germany

Website

Pricing

Free version โŒ
$100,000+/year
Free โœ”๏ธOpen source

Categories

CMS โ€บ Rank #110
CMS โ€บ Rank #4

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The TYPO3 CMS is 162 times more popular than FirstSpirit.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

TYPO3 is more popular than FirstSpirit in all countries.
Germany
Austria
Switzerland
France
Italy
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Denmark
Poland
United States

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

TYPO3 is more popular than FirstSpirit in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Public Information
Travel
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Software/Hardware
Real Estate
Government/Military

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#14,626
#20,273
#41,228
View more โž
Name
Rank
#1,333
#5,185
#5,350
#5,467
View more โž

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.