🆚 Flowplayer vs. jQuery
- 📈 jQuery is much more popular than Flowplayer.
- 🌍 jQuery is more popular in all countries.
Flowplayer
jQueryType
About
Flowplayer is a commercial video player and delivery platform for on-demand, live, and simulated live streaming.
It provides a customizable 
HTML5 player and over 30 plugins for playlists, subtitles, and social sharing, supports HLS and MP4 adaptive bitrate streaming, and includes SVOD and TVOD monetization.
jQuery is a fast, small, feature-rich 
JavaScript library designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, event handling, 
CSS animations, and Ajax.
It provides a cross-browser selector engine, formerly known as Sizzle, supports deferred and promise objects for asynchronous workflows, has built-in 
JSON parsing and utility functions, and allows extensibility through a large ecosystem of plugins.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Turkey in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Norway in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Korea in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Russia in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the Czech Republic in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
OpenJS Foundation company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.