🆚 flv.js vs. ReactPlayer
- 📈 flv.js is much more popular than ReactPlayer.
- 🌎 flv.js is more popular in the United States, China, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 ReactPlayer is more popular in the Faroe Islands.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Video player
Video player
About
An HTML5 Flash Video (FLV) Player written in pure JavaScript without Flash.
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Video Players › Rank #7
Video Players › Rank #16
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #126
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #265
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The flv.js video player is 23 times more popular than ReactPlayer.
Total websites
Market share
Video Players
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
flv.js is more popular in the United States, China, and the United Kingdom, while ReactPlayer is more popular in the Faroe Islands.
United States
China
United Kingdom
Japan
Germany
France
Hong Kong
Spain
Australia
Italy
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Hong Kong in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Japan in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Indonesia in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Video Players category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in the United States in the Video Players category.
- ⬆️ 258th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
flv.js is more popular than ReactPlayer in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Entertainment
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Travel
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.