🆚 Fontastic vs. Swagger
- 📈 Swagger is four times more popular than Fontastic.
- 🌎 Swagger is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Fontastic is more popular in India, Israel, and Japan.
Type
About
Fontastic is a free web-based icon font generator for creating custom icon fonts from existing collections or SVG icons.
It provides over 9,000 icons from popular sets like Font Awesome,
Entypo, and
Ionicons, and allows users to select individual icons, customize
CSS classes and character mappings, and generate custom font packages.
Swagger is a suite of open-source tools built around the
OpenAPI Specification that enables developers to design, build, and document REST APIs through a standardized, machine- and human-readable interface.
It supports OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, and JSON Schema and includes components such as Swagger Editor for writing and validating API definitions with real-time feedback, Swagger UI for generating interactive documentation, and Swagger Codegen for producing client SDKs and server stubs.
Headquarters
Pricing
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Israel in the Tools category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Tools category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the Tools category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Germany in the Tools category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Italy in the Tools category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United Kingdom in the Tools category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the Netherlands in the Tools category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the Tools category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in France in the Tools category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Italy in the Tools category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,827,502 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
