🆚 Forgejo vs. SourceForge
- 📈 SourceForge is much more popular than Forgejo.
- 🌍 SourceForge is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Forgejo is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Code hosting platform
Code hosting platform
About
Forgejo is an open-source,
Git-based code hosting and collaboration platform that started as a fork of Gitea.
It enables repository management, issue tracking, code review, and workflow automation, and includes pull requests, kanban boards, wikis, package registries, continuous integration through Forgejo Actions, and ActivityPub-based federation support.
Headquarters
Berlin, Germany
San Diego, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Up to 20-30GB disk quota for open-source projects
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The SourceForge code hosting platform is 48 times more popular than Forgejo.
Total websites
Market share
Code Hosting
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
SourceForge is more popular than Forgejo in all countries.
United States
Germany
France
Poland
United Kingdom
Japan
Netherlands
Italy
Russia
Canada
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Code Hosting category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Germany in the Code Hosting category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in France in the Code Hosting category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Poland in the Code Hosting category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Code Hosting category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
SourceForge is more popular than Forgejo in all market segments.
Software/Hardware
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Technical/Business Forums
Technical Information
Shareware/Freeware
Internet Services
Games
Education/Reference
Personal Pages
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,580,056 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Cgit