🆚 Fork Awesome vs. Twemoji
- 📈 Twemoji is much more popular than Fork Awesome.
- 🌍 Twemoji is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
TwemojiType
Icon library
Icon library
About
Fork Awesome is a suite of 796 pictographic and brand icons that began as a fork of Font Awesome.
Twemoji is an Twitter's open source library that provides standard Unicode emoji support across all platforms.
Headquarters
Bastrop, Texas, United States
GitHubPricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Twemoji icon library is 34 times more popular than Fork Awesome.
Total websites
Market share
Icons
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Twemoji is more popular than Fork Awesome in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
France
Germany
Spain
Italy
Canada
Netherlands
Brazil
Australia
Awards
- ⬆️ 25th most popular in Germany in the Icons category.
- ⬆️ 28th most popular in France in the Icons category.
- ⬆️ 33rd most popular in the United States in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Israel in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Canada in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Finland in the Icons category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Twemoji is more popular than Fork Awesome in all market segments.
Blogs/Wiki
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Internet Services
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Ionicons
Bootstrap Icons
X Corp. company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.