🆚 Fort Awesome vs. Line Awesome

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Icon library
Icon library

About

Fort Awesome was a commercial icon font service that allowed users to create custom icon fonts by selecting specific icons for their projects.

The service is no longer accepting new sign-ups and directs users to the newer Font Awesome platform instead.

Line Awesome is a free Font Awesome alternative that contains 1300+ icons, released by Icons8 under a Good Boy License.

Headquarters

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️
$49+/year
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Icons › Rank #28
Icons › Rank #23
Tools › Rank #26
Legacy › Rank #60

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Line Awesome icon library is 2.3 times more popular than Fort Awesome.
Total websites

Market share

Icons

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Line Awesome is more popular in Japan, the United Kingdom, and Australia, while Fort Awesome is more popular in the United States, Finland, and Denmark.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Australia
India
Italy
Netherlands
France
Spain
Canada

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Line Awesome is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and marketing and merchandising, while Fort Awesome is more commonly used on education and reference, non-profit, advocacy and NGO, and health sites.
Business
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Real Estate

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#9,077
#11,497
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#12,308
#17,244
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.