🆚 Gijgo vs. Toast UI
- 📈 Gijgo is three times more popular than Toast UI.
- 🌎 Gijgo is more popular in the United States, India, and Australia.
- 🌍 Toast UI is more popular in Korea, France, and Canada.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Gijgo
Toast UIType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Gijgo is an open-source set of 
JavaScript controls that includes grid, tree, dialog, dropdown, slider and date/time pickers.
Toast UI is an open-source JavaScript UI library that consists of a markdown editor, image editor, powerful chart, grid, calendar and other components.
Headquarters
Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
Seongnam, Korea
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #249
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #275
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Gijgo JavaScript library is 3 times more popular than Toast UI.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Gijgo is more popular in the United States, India, and Australia, while Toast UI is more popular in Korea, France, and Canada.
United States
India
Australia
Korea
United Kingdom
Brazil
France
Russia
Spain
Indonesia
Awards
- ⬆️ 172nd most popular in India in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 249th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Gijgo is more popular among sites focused on business, blogs and wiki, and marketing and merchandising, while Toast UI is more commonly used on software and hardware, recreation and hobbies, and entertainment sites.
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Travel
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Online Shopping
Health
Government/Military
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
NHN company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.