🆚 Githack vs. RawGit
- 📈 RawGit is much more popular than Githack.
- 🌎 RawGit is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Githack is more popular in Iran, South Africa, and Ghana.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Public CDN
Public CDN
About
Source code caching CDN with proper Content-Type headers backed by Cloudflare's global network.
RawGit is a public CDN for serving files from raw.githubusercontent.com with the correct content types.
Headquarters
Portland, Oregon, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️
Free ✔️
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The RawGit public CDN is 16 times more popular than Githack.
Total websites
Market share
Public CDN
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
RawGit is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, while Githack is more popular in Iran, South Africa, and Ghana.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Korea
India
Brazil
France
Vietnam
Indonesia
Germany
Awards
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Korea in the Public CDN category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Brazil in the Public CDN category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Vietnam in the Public CDN category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Indonesia in the Public CDN category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the Czech Republic in the Public CDN category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
RawGit is more popular than Githack in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Travel
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,823,966 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

