🆚 GitLab Pages vs. Pantheon
- 📈 Pantheon is much more popular than GitLab Pages.
- 🌎 Pantheon is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
- 🌍 GitLab Pages is more popular in Sweden, Russia, and Turkey.
PantheonType
About
GitLab Pages is a static website hosting service that publishes sites directly from repositories and CI/CD pipelines in 
GitLab.
It supports custom domains, automatic TLS certificates, branch-based preview deployments, and deployment workflows from static site generators such as 
Hugo, 
Gatsby, 
Jekyll, and 
Hexo.
Pantheon is a WebOps platform that allows users to host and manage 
WordPress, 
Drupal, and other web projects with infrastructure services such as a global CDN, caching, and load balancing.
It is built on 
Google Cloud infrastructure and provides container-based hosting with full-page and Redis object caching, a global content delivery network backed by 
Fastly, intelligent load distribution across application containers, managed databases (MariaDB and MySQL), automated backups, performance monitoring, and developer workflows with 
Git and CLI tools.
Headquarters
Pricing
(500 GiB, 10K compute minutes) $348/user/year
(500 GiB, 50K compute minutes) Custom
(25K+ visits) $55+/month
(25K+ visits) $655+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Deployment Platforms category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Canada in the Deployment Platforms category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Deployment Platforms category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
GitHub Pages
Neocities
Cloudflare Pages
Codeberg Pages
Bitbucket Cloud
Vercel
Netlify
Upsun
Render
Railway🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.