🆚 GlassFish vs. Oracle Application Server
- 📈 GlassFish is noticeably more popular than Oracle Application Server.
- 🌎 GlassFish is more popular in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Russia.
- 🌍 Oracle Application Server is more popular in Spain, Korea, and Belgium.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Web server
Web server
About
Eclipse GlassFish is a complete application server that implements the Jakarta EE specification.
Oracle Application Server is a completely standards-based application server that provides a comprehensive and fully integrated platform for running Web sites, J2EE applications, and Web services.
Headquarters
Brussels, Belgium
Austin, Texas, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Oracle Internet Application Server license$35,000 per processor
Named User Plus
(minimum of 10 users per processor)$700
(minimum of 10 users per processor)$700
Categories
Web Servers › Rank #31
Web Servers › Rank #33
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The GlassFish web server is 1.5 times more popular than Oracle Application Server.
Total websites
Market share
Web Servers
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
GlassFish is more popular in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Russia, while Oracle Application Server is more popular in Spain, Korea, and Belgium.
Spain
United Kingdom
United States
Russia
Korea
Cameroon
Mexico
Brazil
Belgium
Portugal
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
GlassFish is more popular among sites focused on government and military, while Oracle Application Server is more commonly used on business and education and reference sites.
Government/Military
Business
Education/Reference
Real Estate
Internet Services
Travel
Personal Pages
Software/Hardware
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
projects.eclipse.org
GlassFish