🆚 GOV.UK Design System vs. Singapore Government Design System

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Design system
Design system

About

The GOV.UK Design System is a set of styles, components and patterns to help teams across UK government create user-centered digital services.

SGDS is a frontend framework that aims to provide a beautiful common visual language and user experience for visitors of Singapore Government websites.

Headquarters

London, United Kingdom
Singapore

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Design Systems › Rank #7
Design Systems › Rank #11
UI Frameworks › Rank #40
UI Frameworks › Rank #51

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

GOV.UK Design System technology is 2.9 times more popular than Singapore Government Design System.
Total websites

Market share

Design Systems
UI Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

GOV.UK Design System is more popular in the United Kingdom, Slovakia, and the United States, while Singapore Government Design System is more popular in Singapore.
United Kingdom
Singapore
Slovakia
United States
Argentina
Germany
Thailand
Vietnam

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

GOV.UK Design System is more popular than Singapore Government Design System in all market segments.
Government/Military
Business
Public Information
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Education/Reference
Travel
Art/Culture/Heritage
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#76
#10,981
#11,555
#12,772
#13,897
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#7,032
#7,866
#8,596
#9,658
#17,483
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.