🆚 GOV.UK Design System vs. USWDS

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Design system
Design system

About

The GOV.UK Design System is a set of styles, components and patterns to help teams across UK government create user-centered digital services.

The United States Web Design System helps the federal government build fast, accessible, mobile-friendly websites.

Headquarters

London, United Kingdom
Washington, D.C., United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Design Systems › Rank #7
Design Systems › Rank #3
UI Frameworks › Rank #40
UI Frameworks › Rank #26

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The USWDS design system is 4 times more popular than GOV.UK Design System.
Total websites

Market share

Design Systems
UI Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

USWDS is more popular in the United States, India, and Canada, while GOV.UK Design System is more popular in the United Kingdom and Slovakia.
United States
United Kingdom
Slovakia
India
Canada
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
Australia
France

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

USWDS is more popular among sites focused on government and military, business, and health, while GOV.UK Design System is more commonly used on public information and non-profit, advocacy and NGO sites.
Government/Military
Business
Health
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Public Information
Finance/Banking
Online Shopping
Travel
Software/Hardware

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#76
#10,981
#11,555
#12,772
#13,897
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#110
#183
#1,014
#1,093
#1,186
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.