🆚 Grammarly vs. QuillBot
- 📈 Grammarly is twice as popular as QuillBot.
- 🌎 Grammarly is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and India.
- 🌍 QuillBot is more popular in South Africa, France, and New Zealand.
Grammarly
QuillBotType
About
Grammarly is an online grammar checker and AI writing assistant that helps users improve written communication by analyzing text for grammar, spelling, clarity, tone, and style issues.
It provides real-time writing suggestions, sentence rewrites and paraphrasing, tone detection, plagiarism checking against large web and academic databases, generative AI tools for drafting and summarizing text, and citation generation for APA, MLA, and Chicago styles.
QuillBot is an AI-powered writing assistant that helps users rewrite, improve, and generate text through automated language processing tools.
It offers a paraphrasing engine with multiple rewriting modes, grammar checking, summarization of long texts, citation generation in APA, MLA, and Chicago styles, plagiarism detection, and integrations with Chrome, 
Microsoft Word, and 
Google Docs.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Generative AI category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Text Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Generative AI category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Generative AI category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Text Tools category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United States in the Generative AI category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.