🆚 Grav vs. Kirby
- 📈 Grav is much more popular than Kirby.
- 🌍 Grav is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Kirby is a commercial flat-file content management system that lets users build websites using plain text files for content without requiring a database.
It supports Markdown for text formatting,
YAML-based blueprints to define structured fields and content models, multilingual sites, customizable user roles and permissions, and built-in image manipulation and media management.
Headquarters
Evergreen, Colorado, United States
Neckargemünd, Germany
Pricing
Free version ✔️Open source
Premium plugins$30+
Free version ✔️Free upon request for students, selected educational projects, charities and nonprofits
Basic€99
Enterprise€349
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Grav CMS is 19 times more popular than Kirby.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Grav is more popular than Kirby in all countries.
Germany
United States
France
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Italy
Australia
Netherlands
Czech Republic
Canada
Awards
- ⬆️ 24th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in France in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 36th most popular in Switzerland in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Grav is more popular than Kirby in all market segments.
Internet Services
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Software/Hardware
Entertainment
Travel
Art/Culture/Heritage
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Pico