🆚 Halo vs. Liferay
- 📈 Liferay is much more popular than Halo.
- 🌎 Liferay is more popular in Spain, the United States, and Italy.
- 🌍 Halo is more popular in China.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
LiferayType
Content management system
Content management system
About
Liferay Portal is an open-source enterprise web platform for building business solutions, intranets, customer portals, and digital experiences across web and mobile channels.
It offers a modular architecture with reusable portlets, role-based access control, content and document management, workflow and business process automation, built-in collaboration tools such as forums and wikis, and integration capabilities with enterprise systems via APIs and connectors.
Headquarters
Diamond Bar, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️Open source
EnterpriseCustom
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Liferay CMS is 174 times more popular than Halo.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Liferay is more popular in Spain, the United States, and Italy, while Halo is more popular in China.
Spain
United States
Italy
Finland
Germany
Brazil
France
Poland
United Kingdom
Austria
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Spain in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Brazil in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Portugal in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Italy in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Finland in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Liferay is more popular than Halo in all market segments.
Business
Government/Military
Finance/Banking
Education/Reference
Public Information
Travel
Health
Marketing/Merchandising
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Z-BlogPHP🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.