🆚 HAPedit vs. iWeb
- 📈 iWeb is much more popular than HAPedit.
- 🌍 iWeb is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ HAPedit is particularly popular in Italy.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
HAPedit
iWebType
HTML editor
HTML editor
About
HAPedit (from the acronym "Html Asp Php") is a free 
Windows text editor for developers.
iWeb is a WYSIWYG template-based website building tool that had been released by Apple Inc. from 2006 to 2011.
Headquarters
Cupertino, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The iWeb HTML editor is 35 times more popular than HAPedit.
Total websites
Market share
HTML Editors
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
iWeb is more popular than HAPedit in all countries.
United States
Germany
Italy
Netherlands
United Kingdom
France
Japan
Australia
Canada
Spain
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United States in the HTML Editors category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the Netherlands in the HTML Editors category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Australia in the HTML Editors category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Italy in the HTML Editors category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in France in the HTML Editors category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
iWeb is more popular than HAPedit in all market segments.
Entertainment
Education/Reference
Art/Culture/Heritage
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Personal Pages
Health
Restaurants
Travel
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Adobe DreamWeaver
BBEdit🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.