🆚 HLS.js vs. Vidstack
- 📈 HLS.js is much more popular than Vidstack.
- 🌍 HLS.js is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Vidstack is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
HLS.js
VidstackType
Video player
Video player
About
HLS.js is a 
JavaScript library that implements an HTTP Live Streaming client, using HTML5 video and MediaSource extensions. .
Vidstack Player is a open-source framework and collection of UI components for building and managing custom media players on the web.
Headquarters
Paris, France
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Video Players › Rank #10
Video Players › Rank #19
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #168
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #288
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The HLS.js video player is 36 times more popular than Vidstack.
Total websites
Market share
Video Players
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
HLS.js is more popular than Vidstack in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Indonesia
China
Italy
Japan
Netherlands
Russia
France
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Indonesia in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in China in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Japan in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Germany in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Italy in the Video Players category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
HLS.js is more popular than Vidstack in all market segments.
Entertainment
Business
General News
Internet Radio/TV
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Online Shopping
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Dailymotion company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.