🆚 Hover.css vs. Ress
- 📈 Hover.css is much more popular than Ress.
- 🌎 Hover.css is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy.
- 🌍 Ress is more popular in Japan, Ecuador, and Mongolia.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Hover.cssType
Website component
Website component
About
A collection of CSS3 powered hover effects to be applied to links, buttons, logos, SVG, featured images.
A modern 
CSS reset based on Normalize.css.
Headquarters
Devon, United Kingdom
Brazil
Pricing
Free version ✔️ For personal/open source use, open source
Commercial License
1 project $14
Unlimited projects $18
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Hover.css component technology is 6 times more popular than Ress.
Total websites
Market share
Components
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Hover.css is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy, while Ress is more popular in Japan, Ecuador, and Mongolia.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Italy
Spain
Germany
India
France
Australia
Netherlands
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Spain in the Components category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Turkey in the Components category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Vietnam in the Components category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Italy in the Components category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in India in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Components category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Hover.css is more popular than Ress in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Normalize.css
Styled Components
Modern-normalize
AMP
Polymer🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.