🆚 Htmx vs. SignalR
- 📈 Htmx is three times more popular than SignalR.
- 🌎 Htmx is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 SignalR is more popular in Denmark, Vietnam, and Iran.
Type
About
Htmx is an open-source JavaScript library that extends
HTML by adding custom attributes to trigger AJAX requests,
CSS transitions,
WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events directly in HTML markup.
It enables any HTML element to issue HTTP requests using any HTTP method and any event, injects server-returned HTML into targeted DOM elements without full page reloads, and supports lazy loading, infinite scroll, and inline editing.
SignalR is a library for ASP.NET that enables real-time two-way communication between servers and clients.
It supports multiple transport methods (WebSockets, Server-Sent Events, long polling) with automatic negotiation, provides a Hub API for calling methods from server or client, handles connection lifecycle, supports groups and broadcast messaging, and scales via backplanes and
Azure SignalR Service.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 80th most popular in Norway in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 100th most popular in Germany in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 100th most popular in Switzerland in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 100th most popular in Belgium in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 114th most popular in Sweden in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 204th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 209th most popular in the United Kingdom in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.


