🆚 Hugging Face vs. Jupyter Notebook
- 📈 Hugging Face is four times more popular than Jupyter Notebook.
- 🌎 Hugging Face is more popular in the United States, China, and France.
- 🌍 Jupyter Notebook is more popular in Australia.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Data science technology
Data science technology
About
Hugging Face is a machine learning and data science platform and community that helps users build, deploy and train machine learning models.
Jupyter Notebook is a web application that allows you to execute code, visualize its output (such as plots, images, tables, etc.), and write explanations - all in a single notebook file.
Headquarters
New York, United States
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Hugging Face data science technology is 4 times more popular than Jupyter Notebook.
Total websites
Market share
Data Science
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Hugging Face is more popular in the United States, China, and France, while Jupyter Notebook is more popular in Australia.
United States
China
France
Vietnam
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
Korea
Brazil
Netherlands
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Data Science category.
- ⬆️ 52nd most popular in the United States in the Social Media category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Hugging Face is more popular among sites focused on business, blogs and wiki, and Internet services, while Jupyter Notebook is more commonly used on technical information, education and reference, and software and hardware sites.
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Technical Information
Education/Reference
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Technical/Business Forums
Personal Pages
Finance/Banking
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Quarto