🆚 Hugo vs. ReadMe

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Static site generator
Static site generator

About

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go that focuses on speed, flexibility and structured content organization.

It supports Markdown content, templating, configurable taxonomies, multilingual sites, image processing, Sass and JavaScript pipelines, pretty URLs, a live-reload development server, and shortcodes to insert elements such as videos, images and social media embeds.

ReadMe is a cloud-based documentation platform that helps teams create, publish, and manage interactive API documentation hubs.

It provides a WYSIWYG and MDX (Markdown eXtended) editor with versioning and Git sync, interactive API references where developers can test endpoints and see live responses, built-in AI tools for writing and linting, customizable components and themes, and changelogs and guides.

Headquarters

San Francisco, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️3 published versions, no custom domain or forum
Plans
Startup$99/month
Business$399/month
Enterprise$3,000+/month
Ask AI
(an AI assistant)
$150

Categories

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Hugo static site generator is 22 times more popular than ReadMe.
Total websites

Market share

Static Site Generators

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Hugo is more popular than ReadMe in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Netherlands
Japan
Switzerland
Australia
China

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Hugo is more popular than ReadMe in all market segments.
Blogs/Wiki
Business
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Technical/Business Forums
Technical Information
Marketing/Merchandising
Games
Personal Pages

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.