🆚 Humans.txt vs. OpenSearch
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 OpenSearch is four times more popular than Humans.txt.
- 🌎 OpenSearch is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Humans.txt is more popular in Australia, Belgium, and Norway.
OpenSearchType
About
Humans.txt is a text file that can be created by developers to list the people who have contributed to a website.
OpenSearch is a specification that describes a website's search engine, enabling browsers, apps, and services to discover and integrate it.
It is implemented as a linked XML file and was originally developed by Amazon to make it easier for other applications to integrate their search services.
Headquarters
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 17th most popular in Belgium in the Standards category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Norway in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Australia in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Austria in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in the United Kingdom in the Standards category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Kazakhstan in the Standards category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Azerbaijan in the Standards category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Uzbekistan in the Standards category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in the Dominican Republic in the Standards category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Tajikistan in the Standards category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Pingback
Sitemap
RDF
Amazon company profile* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.