🆚 Hypernova vs. Sapper
- 📈 Hypernova is twice as popular as Sapper.
- 🌍 Hypernova is more popular in Poland, Portugal, and the Netherlands.
- 🌎 Sapper is more popular in the United States, Russia, and Cyprus.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Backend framework
Backend framework
About
Hypernova is a legacy open-source service from 
Airbnb that renders 
JavaScript views on the server to deliver 
HTML for better page load and search engine indexing.
Sapper is an open-source 
Svelte framework for server-rendered and client-hydrated web applications that has been deprecated in favor of its successor, SvelteKit.
It supports file-based routing with server routes and pages, both 
Rollup and 
Webpack templates, legacy browser builds, and 
TypeScript.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
New York, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Hypernova backend framework is 2.4 times more popular than Sapper.
Total websites
Market share
Backend Frameworks
Legacy
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Hypernova is more popular in Poland, Portugal, and the Netherlands, while Sapper is more popular in the United States, Russia, and Cyprus.
Poland
United States
Portugal
Netherlands
Germany
Czech Republic
Belgium
United Kingdom
Slovakia
Japan
Awards
- 🔥 14th most popular in Poland in the Backend Frameworks category.
- ⬆️ 26th most popular in Poland in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Hypernova is more popular among sites focused on public information, online shopping, and restaurants, while Sapper is more commonly used on business, real estate, and general news sites.
Public Information
Online Shopping
Restaurants
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Fashion/Beauty
Real Estate
Travel
General News
Education/Reference
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.