🆚 IBM WebSphere Homepage Builder vs. Notepad++
- 📈 IBM WebSphere Homepage Builder is much more popular than Notepad++.
- 🌍 IBM WebSphere Homepage Builder is more popular in Japan and Greece.
- 🌎 Notepad++ is more popular in Germany, the United States, and France.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
HTML editor
HTML editor
About
IBM WebSphere Homepage Builder is a WYSIWYG HTML editor for
Windows and
Linux that was available until the mid-2000s.
Notepad++ is a free source code editor for Windows that supports about 90 programming languages with syntax highlighting and code folding.
Headquarters
Armonk, New York, United States
Paris, France
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The IBM WebSphere Homepage Builder HTML editor is 7 times more popular than Notepad++.
Total websites
Market share
HTML Editors
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
IBM WebSphere Homepage Builder is more popular in Japan and Greece, while Notepad++ is more popular in Germany, the United States, and France.
Japan
Germany
United States
France
Belgium
United Kingdom
Argentina
Poland
Russia
Denmark
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the HTML Editors category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in Japan in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
IBM WebSphere Homepage Builder is more popular among sites focused on online shopping, software and hardware, and marketing and merchandising, while Notepad++ is more commonly used on entertainment and travel sites.
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Education/Reference
Real Estate
Public Information
Travel
Technical Information
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.



