🆚 Icecat vs. Pimcore
- 📈 Pimcore is much more popular than Icecat.
- 🌍 Pimcore is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
- 🌎 Icecat is more popular in Mexico and Lithuania.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Product information management system
Content management system
About
Icecat delivers Product Information Management As-A-Service to brand owners that want to increase their product visibility.
Pimcore is an open-source enterprise platform that includes PIM, MDM, CDP, DAM, DXP/CMS, and digital commerce.
Headquarters
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Salzburg, Austria
Pricing
Content Users
Open Icecat
Free ✔️Sponsored Brands Only
Full Icecat
Starter$375+/month
1 Vertical$650+/month
Complete$3,750+/month
Brands
Brand Cloud
Free version ✔️
Starter$1,200+/year
Open Icecat
Standard$1,500+/year
Rich$3,750+/year
Free version ✔️Open source
PaaSOn request
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Pimcore CMS is 24 times more popular than Icecat.
Total websites
Market share
PIM
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Pimcore is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, while Icecat is more popular in Mexico and Lithuania.
Germany
Austria
Switzerland
Italy
France
Czech Republic
Poland
Belgium
Netherlands
Sweden
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the PIM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Austria in the PIM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Switzerland in the PIM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the PIM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the PIM category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Pimcore is more popular than Icecat in all market segments.
Business
Travel
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Sports
Public Information
Entertainment
Health
Education/Reference
Software/Hardware
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Icecat
Acquia DAM
Salsify